The original We-Vibe Sync is one of the few couples vibrators I orgasm with easily and reliably during sex, completely hands-free. It’s up there with the We-Vibe Chorus and We-Vibe Sync 2 and if you can still find it available, it’s usually the most affordable of the three.

Like all couples vibrators, it’s gentler than holding a handheld vibrator to my clit during sex, but it adds extra G-spot pressure, and frees up your hands during sex. The clit and G-spot stimulation together are enough for me, but if you typically need a lot of power to orgasm, the Sync may not be enough. In which case, a wand in the Liberator Axis mount is my favorite hands-free alternative.

The Sync’s two adjustable hinges sit at the base of the clit arm, and on the internal arm, letting me shape the toy to my body. Once I set it, the clit motor maintains good contact without needing to reposition. The fit is much tighter than flexible-only models like the We-Vibe Sync Lite, Sync Go, Lelo Tiani 3, and Dame Eva: those bend, spring back, and shift off my clit.

Keep in mind, C-shaped toys like this are still somewhat dependent on your anatomy to fit right. You can adjust the angle, but not the length of the arms.

The internal arm’s primary stimulation comes from added pressure rather than vibrations, which are very weak. It is thinner and less bulbous than the Sync 2’s or Chorus’s, so I prefer to adjust that second hinge into a pronounced shape for the best internal pressure. Once I have it adjusted properly, thrusting presses the arm into my front wall and makes the stimulation feel fuller and helps me orgasm.

Comfort during sex is excellent. The slim internal arm leaves enough room for penetration, does not pinch or poke, and feels slightly gentler than the more pronounced arms on the Sync 2 and Chorus. My partner feels the arm’s vibrations, but they have stayed subtle enough to be neutral for him rather than distracting or overstimulating, and entry feels snug without being too tight.

All 3 are great picks for during-sex use. Go with the Sync for the most affordable option and slightly slimmer internal arm, which may be more comfortable to some. Or choose the newer Sync 2 or Chorus if you want a slightly thicker internal arm for more G-spot pressure and a fuller feel.

In the next sections, I’ll cover the Moxie+’s vibration power and rumbliness in-depth.

Here’s the main conclusion:

The Moxie+’s clit stimulation is middle-of-the-road. It’s moderately strong, but the straight design transfers that power inconsistently to my clit. And it’s not that rumbly either like people often expect from We-Vibe.

If you value clit stimulation most, the Lovense Ferri is strongest, or go with the VeDO Niki if you care more about rumbliness. Both are stronger than the Moxie+ and transfer their vibrations better to my clit.

In the next sections, I’ll cover the Sync’s clit vibration power, range, transfer, and rumbliness in more detail.

Here’s the main conclusion:

The original We-Vibe Sync is tied with the Sync 2 and Chorus for the most effective clit stimulation I have gotten from a couples vibrator worn during sex. Its motor is only moderately strong, but the adjustable fit keeps that strength pressed against my clit, so the vibes transfer well.

The Sync is not the right choice if you mainly want maximum clit power outside of sex. Stronger panty vibrators and handheld toys feel more intense. But amongst couples vibrators, the Sync’s combination of consistent contact, gradual power adjustability, and moderately deep vibrations works very well for me.

The Moxie+’s clit motor delivers decent power, but its straight, firm body doesn’t transfer that power to your clit as reliably as the best panty vibrators.

At 6.75 out of 10, the top setting is about 72% of the Lovense Ferri‘s 9.35 and a step behind the VeDO Niki‘s 8.0. I can’t orgasm hands-free with the Moxie+ like I can with those other two panty vibes.

The range is wide with small, comfortable steps between levels. When controlled with the remote, the Moxie+ steps through 13 levels from a very gentle 0.70 up to its 6.75 top setting – so there’s plenty of warmup levels and moderate settings, just nothing very strong at the top.

The vibration transfer to my clit is inconsistent. With a handheld you can press harder for more intensity; with a wearable, the toy’s shape has naturally deliver the vibrations to your clit, and shapes that contour to your body do that better.

The Moxie+ is firm, long, and straight, so it doesn’t stay snug against the body. When I get it situated just right, transfer is fine, but keeping it there is difficult. The straight body slips out of position with normal movement, the same way the Romp Party does, and once it shifts, the intensity I actually feel drops off.

If you want stronger clit stimulation, both the Ferri(app-controlled) and Niki(remote-controlled) are better choices.

The Sync’s clit motor is only moderately powerful but very effective for a couples vibrator because it transfers that power well. It starts gently and reaches 6.75 out of 10 on high.

That’s weaker than other wearable vibrators overall (like the Lovense Ferri), but it’s some of the strongest I’ve found in C-shaped couples vibrators: tied with the Chorus and Sync 2.

Couples vibrators like these rely on a combination of moderate clit vibrations, plus added G-spot pressure during penetration to build enough stimulation for orgasm.

What the Sync does well is transfer that clit’s motor strength to my body. The adjustable hinge holds the external arm against me snugly. The hinge at the base of the external arm is most important for this, but there is also a second adjustable hinge on the internal arm.

The Sync has a wide range of power. It starts at a very gentle 0.25, and climbs through 13 levels to full power. That gives me a slow build with gradual steps.

Unlike several newer We-Vibe models, the Sync reaches both its gentlest setting and true top power from the app. Unfortunately the Chorus and Sync 2’s top strengths are capped in the app.

But the Sync is one of the most stimulating couples vibrators I’ve tried, and one of the most affordable since it’s an older model.

We rate rumbly vibrations higher than buzzy because most people prefer them – but it’s a personal preference, and some people prefer buzzy – I personally like both.

The Moxie+’s rumbliness is subpar. It’s extremely rumbly on its lowest settings (starting around 49 Hz), but moderately buzzy at median power (102 Hz), and extremely buzzy at the top (122 Hz). Since the lowest settings are gentle and mostly warmup levels – most of the frequency range you’ll use will feel buzzy.

That’s essentially the same profile as most other panty vibrator I’ve tested except the VeDO Niki.

The Lovense Ferri, Romp Party, and NS Novelties Techno Lucy all run moderately buzzy at median power and cross into extremely buzzy on high. However, because some options, like the Ferri, have more power at similar frequencies to the Moxie+, the stronger ones actually feel more rumbly than the Moxie+.

For a wearable clit vibrator, frequency matters less than the power and how reliably the toy delivers that power to your clit – frequency is secondary. But the Moxie+ is only decent on all three. If rumbly vibrations are specifically what you’re after in a panty vibe, the VeDO Niki is the most rumbly and it gets the power and clit transfer right too.

The Sync’s clit vibrations are fairly deep for a wearable at the lower and middle settings, but they turn buzzy at the top. If you enjoy some buzzy vibrations, this gives you a nice range of options, but the newer Sync 2 is more rumbly on higher strengths.

At the lowest settings, the Sync’s motor is extremely rumbly, though those levels are mostly useful for warming up. The middle of the range sits around 80 Hz, which feels neutral rather than distinctly rumbly or buzzy. That depth helps the moderate power feel more substantial, because lower-frequency vibrations travel farther into the body than sharp surface-level buzz.

The highest setting climbs to 111 Hz, which is extremely buzzy. Vibrators usually get buzzier as they get stronger, but the Sync crosses further than its siblings: the Sync 2 stays neutral, and the Chorus only reaches moderately buzzy.

The Sync has a faint rhythmic tapping layered over the steady vibration, especially on gentler settings, but it is subtle compared to the Sync 2 and Chorus. If rumbliness is your priority, the Sync 2 is the better choice.

Like all panty vibrators, the We-Vibe Moxie+ only stimulates your clit – not your G-spot. Since most women need clit stimulation to orgasm, a panty vibrator is often the right type of wearable. But if you’re interested in G-spot stimulation instead, see all our recommendations for the best egg vibrators here.

In the next sections, I’ll cover the Sync’s G-spot vibration power, transfer, and rumbliness in more detail.

Here’s the main conclusion:

The original We-Vibe Sync’s G-spot stimulation is minimal on its own but useful during sex. The internal motor is very mild and buzzy, which is common for couples vibrators because you get more stimulation from the added G-spot pressure during penetration rather than the vibes.

The Sync’s internal arm is thinner and less bulbous than the Sync 2 and Chorus arms, so it takes more hinge adjustment to get it how I want it. But once you find your right fit, thrusting presses the arm into my front wall and adds the kind of pressure that makes the toy feel more stimulating than clit-only models, like the Sync O.

If you want strong, rumbly G-spot vibration for solo play, choose an egg vibrator or a larger dual-stimulation toy like the Lovense Dolce.

But for use during sex, the Sync is great.

The Sync’s G-spot motor is very mild, which is normal for hands-free couples vibrators. It tops out at 1.25 out of 10, less than one-fifth of the clit motor’s 6.75 and one of the gentlest internal motors of any wearable I have tested.

The 13 levels are so gradual, I can barely distinguish one step from the next.

But every hands-free couples vibrator I have tested has a gentle internal motor, including the We-Vibe Chorus at 2.50, the Sync 2 at 2.75, and the Chorus Pro at 3.25. The internal arm’s stimulation is more about added G-spot pressure than vibrations.

Used solo, the Sync’s internal vibrations feel weak and diffuse. During penetration, the bulbous shape presses firmly against the front wall as my partner thrusts. That pressure helps me orgasm hands-free.

If you value G-spot vibrations more and don’t need to use it during sex, an egg vibrator like the Lovense Lush 4 is much stronger internally.

The Sync is great for those who want some extra G-spot pressure and are specifically looking for a hands-free toy to wear during sex.

The Sync’s internal vibrations are buzzy, especially past the lowest settings. That is typical for a slim couples-vibrator arm.

The lowest settings sit around 72 Hz and feel moderately rumbly, but they are also very gentle. The middle and upper settings climb quickly into the extremely buzzy range, with a median around 139 Hz and 203 Hz on high.

Used solo, that buzziness is one reason I barely register the internal vibrations: the G-spot is less sensitive than the clit, and buzzy vibrations need more power to compensate. During sex, the pressure from the arm is what makes the stimulation meaningful, so the buzziness doesn’t bother me.

If you want strong, rumbly internal vibration on its own, an egg vibrator like the Lovense Lush 4 is the better fit.

In the next sections, I’ll cover the We-Vibe app’s close-range features, long-distance features, and connectivity in detail.

Here’s the main conclusion:

We-Vibe’s app is buggy in close range and unreliable in long-distance. Lovense’s app is by far the better app.

In close-range there are ongoing bugs that affect several products, including the Moxie+. The controls sometimes freeze and require you to close/re-open the app. Long-distance control has a bug that often blocks you from connecting at all.

While the Moxie+ specifically has shown fewer bugs in our testing than other We-Vibe products like the We-Vibe Chorus Pro, Jive 2, and other newer models, the persistent glitches for other products make it hard to trust the Moxie+ either.

If app control is a priority to you in a panty vibrator, go with the Lovense Ferri. Its app is the best of any brand, with outstanding features and connectivity. Plus, the Ferri is the panty vibrator I orgasm with hands-free the easiest.

In the next sections, I’ll cover the We-Vibe app’s close-range features, long-distance features, and connectivity in more detail.

Here’s the main conclusion: The We-Vibe app is the Sync’s biggest weakness. It has good features on paper, and the Sync’s Bluetooth signal is strong, but the app is buggy and controls freeze often enough that I would not rely on it.

If app control matters more than hands-free use during sex, a Lovense toy such as the Ferri (clit stim), Lush 4 (G-spot stim), or Dolce (dual-stim) is a better choice, though none of those are wearable during sex. We-Vibe makes the only good couples vibrators I can orgasm with, so if that’s your goal, the Sync is still worth choosing – I’d just skip the app and use the remote or on-toy button.

The We-Vibe Moxie+’s close-range features in the app are decent when they work. It has simple control interfaces to adjust intensity and choose from preset patterns without in-depth custom pattern creation. But bugs occasionally cause the controls to break, which requires an app restart. While the bugs are less prominent for the Moxie+ than for We-Vibe’s newer toys, if app control is a priority, the Lovense Ferri is a far better choice.

We-Vibe’s main control happens on two screens: Single Vibe and Multi Vibe. They work similarly – you drag an on-screen dot to adjust the intensity, and the toy keeps vibrating wherever you leave it. Multi Vibe also splits the screen into four corners, each holding a preset pattern you choose, so dragging the dot into a corner switches to that pattern at whatever strength the dot’s position represents.

It’s a clean design for the basics, and a quick way to flip between a constant intensity and a preset without a menu detour. Unfortunately there’s an annoying bug on the Single and Multi Vibe screens where the motor’s dot sometimes freezes or becomes non-interactive at times.

What you can’t do from these screens is create a custom pattern in the moment the way you can in the Lovense or Satisfyer apps. Pattern creation lives on a separate screen and is pretty unusable.

It’s hidden on a separate screen that takes a few taps to find. Once you’re there, you draw a waveform without being able to feel it; you save and name the pattern, navigate back to the control screen, select the pattern, and only then find out what it feels like.

Patterns are also capped at the width of your screen, so what you create comes back short and choppy. My partner and I both tried creating patterns; his played, mine crashed the app on every one of four attempts and I gave up.

The preset patterns are easy to use but basic. There are 10 of them, each with a name and a one-line waveform icon, so you can roughly tell what you’re picking before you select it. The simple ones – Pulse, Wave – match their names and icons well enough, but others are not intuitive.

You adjust the intensity of a preset pattern from the Single Vibe and Multi Vibe with the control dot. There’s also a Playlist feature for stringing presets together into longer, more varied sequences, but you can’t feel what you’re assembling as you build it, so it’s mostly guesswork – I don’t use it.

Multi-toy control (like if you have a Moxie+ and a Jive 2 for G-spot stimulation) is decent when it works. You can connect several toys at once (we got four going simultaneously) and either control each one independently or merge them all into a single dot. But often one or more of the toys just stopped responding to our actions in the app.

Sound and music modes are okay. Sound mode uses your phone’s mic to make the toy respond to ambient noise. Music mode plays the toy in time with songs saved locally on your phone (no Spotify or Apple Music streaming, which is a bummer).

Both work, but the controls aren’t well labeled – figuring out whether you’re adjusting the mic’s sensitivity or the toy’s max power takes some experimenting. And there’s no minimum-volume threshold, so you can’t tell the toy not to vibrate unless the sound around you is above a certain level.

For better close-range features without bugs, consider the Lovense Ferri.

The We-Vibe app’s close-range features are weak because the app is so buggy. If it worked properly, it would be a decent option for simple intensity control and preset patterns. But the current experience is frustrating.

The main controls are Single Vibe and Multi Vibe. Both let you drag an on-screen dot up or down to adjust intensity. And unlike the newer We-Vibe Sync 2 you can access the Sync’s true top power through the app.

Multi Vibe also lets you assign preset patterns to four corners, so you can quickly switch between steady vibration and a few favorite patterns without digging through menus. On both screens, you can adjust the clit and G-spot motors together or control them independently. The design is simple and convenient in theory.

But the control dot often freezes or stops responding – this happens even more often when you try to control the two motors independently.

There are 10 preset patterns you can choose from in Single or Multi Vibe mode, each with a name and waveform icon. Some are easy to understand, like Pulse and Wave, while others are less clear. There’s also a Playlist feature for stringing patterns together, but you can’t feel what you’re building as you make it, so it’s mostly guesswork.

Custom pattern creation is poor. It’s hidden several taps away from the main control screens, and you can’t feel the pattern while drawing it. You have to draw the waveform, save and name it, return to the control screen, select it, and only then test how it feels. The patterns are also limited by your screen width, so they come out short and choppy. My partner’s custom pattern played, but mine crashed the app repeatedly.

The sound and music modes are okay. Sound Mode uses your phone’s mic, while Music Mode syncs to songs saved locally on your phone – not Spotify or Apple Music. Both work, but the controls are poorly labeled, and there’s no minimum-volume threshold like Lovense offers, which is helpful in preventing your toy from vibrating until the sounds around you are loud enough.

For close-range control, I’d use the Sync’s remote instead of the app. If you mainly want excellent app control, Lovense is much better – choose the Lovense Ferri for clit stimulation, the Lovense Lush 4 for G-spot stimulation, or the Lovense Dolce for dual stimulation. But none of those are couples vibrators to wear during sex. We-Vibe makes the only good couples vibrators I can orgasm with, so if that’s your goal, the Sync is still worth choosing – I’d just skip the app and use the remote.

The We-Vibe app’s long-distance features are broken. The features are designed fine in theory, but persistent bugs make long-distance play unreliable enough that I can’t recommend the app for it at all. If you need long-distance play, get the Lovense Ferri instead.

The long-distance experience mirrors close-range. Your partner gets the same Single Vibe, Multi Vibe, and Touch screens to control your Moxie+, and vice-versa. You can even take back control of your own toy mid-session without ending the call – a feature I wish more apps had.

But the same bugs from close-range control affect the long-distance control – the control dot occasionally freezes or becomes unresponsive. Additionally, both partners frequently show up as “offline” to each other even when you’re both in the app, which prevents you from starting a session at all.

Even when long-distance does connect, getting into a video call takes four separate request-and-accepts (call, camera, control of your toy, control of theirs). And the in-app video feed is blurry and choppy in a way Lovense’s isn’t.

The messaging itself is decent as a basic messenger, with text, photos, voice notes, and video clips. We-Vibe also lets you save multiple partners, but doesn’t offer the anonymous one-time control links or the auto-accept settings for trusted partners that Lovense’s app does.

For long-distance play, the Lovense Ferri is cheaper and a far better panty vibrator.

The We-Vibe app’s long-distance features are too buggy to recommend.

The design is decent in theory, but persistent connection and control issues make long-distance play unreliable. If long-distance control matters there are no good couples vibrators – you’re better off with a different type of wearable. The Lovense Ferri for clit stimulation, the Lovense Lush 4 for G-spot stimulation, or the Lovense Dolce for dual stimulation are better long-distance options.

Long-distance control in We-Vibe’s app is supposed to work like close-range control. Your partner gets the same Single Vibe, Multi Vibe, and Touch screens to control your Sync, and you can control their toy the same way. You can also take back control of your own toy mid-session without ending the call, which is a useful feature.

But the same close-range bugs carry over: the control dot sometimes freezes or stops responding. And most importantly, both partners often show as “offline” even when you’re both in the app, which prevents you from starting a session at all.

Even when it does connect, starting a video call is clunky. You have to send and accept four separate requests: the call, camera access, control of your toy, and control of theirs. The video feed is blurry and choppy compared to Lovense.

Chat works as a basic messenger, with text, photos, voice notes, and video clips. We-Vibe does let you save multiple partners, but it doesn’t offer Lovense’s anonymous one-time control links or auto-accept settings for trusted partners.

One area the Sync is better than the newer models: you can access the Sync’s true top power through the app, unlike the newer We-Vibe Sync 2. So your partner will have access to the full power range when the connection works.

For long-distance play, a Lovense toy like the Ferri, Lush 4, or Dolce is far better, but they don’t have any couples vibrators to wear during sex.

The We-Vibe app’s connectivity with the Moxie+ is poor in close-range and broken in long-distance.

The Bluetooth hardware itself is fine: range is excellent, and body interference doesn’t faze it. But bugs cause unreliable reconnection, frequent command misses, and trouble with long-distance play. Lovense has the most reliable app connectivity by a wide margin – consider the Lovense Ferri if app control is a priority.

Initial pairing in close-range is straightforward – add the Moxie+ to the app’s toy carousel once, and from then on it’s two taps to connect with no on-toy action needed. For most people, who own one or two We-Vibe toys and use a single phone, this part works fine.

The breakdown happens if you own several We-Vibe toys and switch between them often, or if you regularly switch which phone is controlling the same toy (like if you and your partner both connect occasionally). This causes the quick-connect routine to fail, and recovering often means deleting the toy from the app, forgetting it from your phone’s Bluetooth settings, and walking through the full pairing flow again – an annoying start to your play.

Reconnection during play is inconsistent. If you drop signal and get back in range within 10-20 seconds, the app typically reconnects automatically – but during that window the app doesn’t show that the connection has dropped, so your partner can be “controlling” the toy on screen while nothing is actually happening to your toy. Wait too long to come back in range and you’ll have to tap through the connection screens again, sometimes including holding the on-toy button, which can be awkward when you’re wearing the toy.

Even when the connection holds, the app’s controls break. Command misses are frequent enough that I don’t trust the app to keep up with what I’m asking it to do. Especially on Single and Multi Vibe screens.

The Moxie+ handles body interference cleanly. Our body-interference test simulates partner-control at three progressively harder positions – angles where your body sits between a partner’s phone and the toy which can block the signal. The Moxie+ holds a stable connection at all three. Water-rich body tissue weakens Bluetooth signals more than walls or clothes, and many wearables drop the connection at the third, most severe position; the Moxie+ doesn’t. The signal is strong, and the reliability problems are app-side. Bluetooth range is also excellent – the connection held at 250 feet in our open-air test.

Long-distance is where the app is fully broken. The problem is the two app-level bugs I covered in the Long Distance Features section above: both partners frequently show as “offline” to each other and can’t start a session at all, and when they do connect, control commands often stop reaching the toys. Both bugs happen regularly without a reliable way to fix it.

If reliable app connectivity is what you need – close-range or long-distance – go with the Lovense Ferri. It has outstanding connectivity and it’s the panty vibrator I can most consistently orgasm with hands-free.

The Sync’s app connectivity is poor even though the toy’s Bluetooth signal is strong. The issue is the glitchy We-Vibe app, not the signal itself, which is why similar problems show up across all We-Vibe couples vibrators.

In our Bluetooth tests, the Sync’s app connection handled body interference well. The test simulates body interfernce at three increasingly difficult angles, and the Sync stayed connected through all three. Its open-air range reached 200 feet in a clear line-of-sight range test, which is more range than you need for a toy used during sex.

Pairing is not hard, but it is more cumbersome than it should be. You swipe to the Sync in the app’s toy carousel and tap Connect. The app walks you through holding the toy’s button until it vibrates twice, though I can usually tap “Done” and skip that step.

When quick connect fails (especially with multiple We-Vibe toys or two phones in the mix) recovery can mean forgetting the toy in phone Bluetooth settings, deleting it from the app, and pairing from scratch.

Reconnection is inconsistent. If I come back into range within about 10 to 20 seconds, the app often reconnects by itself, but it does not clearly tell me the connection dropped while it is happening. That means a partner can keep dragging the control dot while nothing reaches the toy. After a longer drop, the app shows a disconnect message and requires a manual reconnect, sometimes with a press on the toy’s button.

Long-distance connectivity is worse. Both partners can show as offline while both are active in the app – when this happens you can’t connect at all and we’ve found no reliable workaround. Even when sessions start, commands often stop reaching the toy mid-session. All these bugs make the Sync a bad choice if app control is a main priority.

In the next sections, I’ll cover the Moxie+’s remote features and connectivity in detail.

Here’s the main conclusion:

The Moxie+’s remote is good for solo play or partnered play where your partner has a clear line-of-sight to you (like not sitting at an angle to you or behind you). It has all the controls you need and a long connection range.

The one limitation is body interference: commands often don’t go through when your body sits in the signal path between your partner’s remote and the toy, where most panty-vibe remotes I’ve tested hold steady.

Go with the VeDO Niki for reliable through-body partner control.

In the next sections, I’ll cover the Sync’s remote features and connectivity in more detail.

Here’s the main conclusion: The Sync’s remote is good during sex, though not the best for a partner controlling your toy as you wear it around.

It has some issues with body interference missing commands when a partner controls your toy from behind you or at an odd angle – this mainly happens if you’re wearing the toy around, but isn’t really an issue when controlling it during sex from really close.

If a partner controlling your couples vibrator is important to you, the Chorus’s remote did not have any issues with body interference.

The We-Vibe Moxie+’s remote features are great.

One of the best aspects is that the power and pattern controls are separate. There’s dedicated + and − buttons to move forward and backward through 13 power levels, and pressing and holding either button steps through them quickly to reach a higher or lower setting faster.

And there’s forward and backward buttons to move through the 6 vibration patterns. So I never have to cycle past patterns to reach a power level or vice versa – many remotes put them on the same loop.

The remote itself is comfortable to hold. It’s small and silicone-coated sitting naturally in my hand, and the buttons are raised enough that I can feel which is which without looking – this kind of eyes-free operation can be a practical advantage of a remote over an app.

Like most remotes, the Moxie+’s remote just blinks when a button is pressed – there’s no way for the partner holding it to tell what setting your toy is on. It’s not a huge deal, especially if you’re often the one controlling your own toy. But for a controlling partner, it can feel less engaging than an app’s visual feedback.

The We-Vibe Sync’s remote provides good, basic controls.

The best feature is separate power and pattern control. Dedicated buttons move through 13 power levels, and a second pair of buttons moves through the 6 vibration patterns. That means I can turn intensity down without cycling through patterns first. Pressing and holding the top button jumps to full power; holding the bottom button turns the toy off rather than dropping to the gentlest setting.

The remote also lets you raise and lower pattern intensity. The Sync’s 13 levels give the clit motor a gradual build. The remote controls both motors together, though. If you want clit and G-spot motors at different intensities, you have to use the app.

The remote itself is a slim hard-plastic oval. It fits easily in my hand, and the raised buttons have enough of a raised feel that I can use them without looking. The newer Sync 2 remote feels more polished and comfortable because it is silicone.

The feedback is weak for partner control. Like most remotes, the Sync’s just blinks when you press a button, and its blink is faint. It keeps blinking even when the toy is off, so it does not reliably tell the person holding it what is happening. That is fine when I am controlling it myself, but if a partner’s controlling, it doesn’t give them a good idea of what setting I’m on.

The Moxie+’s remote works well on many connection aspects – fast responsiveness, instant reconnection, and one of the longer ranges of my panty vibrators’ remotes (125 ft in our test). But it’s significantly affected by body interference.

Body tissue between the remote and the toy is the main thing that breaks a remote’s signal during partner control – your body can sit in the signal path between your partner’s remote and the toy. And water-rich materials like your body can significantly dampen Bluetooth and RF signals.

Our body-interference test simulates this scenario at three progressively challenging angles, and the Moxie+’s remote drops the connection at all three – the worst of any panty vibrator (including the original Moxie). The on-toy button flashes indicating it has lost connection, and you have to move the remote closer to recover.

It’s important to understand our test runs harsher than typical real-world conditions. At many angles, an external toy like a panty vibrator won’t have any body interference blocking the signal. So your partner-controlled play may be less drop-prone in practice. And for solo control when I’m holding the remote myself, commands have gone through reliably. But most panty-vibe remotes and apps I’ve tested hold a reliable connection through body interference.

If you want reliable control without worrying about where your partner is positioned from you, go with the VeDO Niki for a remote controlled toy or the Lovense Ferri for an app-controlled toy.

The Sync’s remote connection is reliable when I hold it myself during sex, but it has the shortest range in We-Vibe’s couples line and struggles when your body blocks the signal, which can happen when a partner controls your toy.

Body tissue is the main problem for remote control because water-rich tissue absorbs RF and Bluetooth signals. Our body-interference test simulates this interference at increasingly difficult angles (and is harsher than real use). The Sync held steady at the easiest angle, missed about half the commands at the middle angle, and became unreliable at the hardest angle until I brought the remote closer. The We-Vibe Chorus is the only couples vibrator in the line whose remote held through all three; the Sync 2 behaves about like the Sync.

That weakness does not usually show up when I use the remote myself. It stays close to the toy with a clear enough path, and commands go through reliably. The response is slightly slower than the quickest remotes I have tested, landing just after my finger leaves the button, but not slow enough to be annoying.

The open-air range was about 22 feet with clear line of sight, compared with about 38 feet for the Sync 2 and 40 for the Chorus. Real rooms and bodies shorten that. But the remote works fine when the Sync is close by during sex. The issues don’t start until you hand the remote to a partner while wearing the toy around.

Like most panty vibrators, the Moxie+’s on-toy controls are limited by design – the toy sits inside your underwear during use, so you’ll typically rely on the remote.

A single button cycles through four power levels and six patterns, with no minus button. To step back to a gentler power, you click forward through the rest of the loop.

The button is easy to feel, but it’s slim and takes more pressure than most. It also sits at the very top of the toy, so pressing it pushes the toy uncomfortably against my clit. Slipping my thumb under to brace it works, but it’s awkward.

For the full 13-step power range – and any adjustment you’d rather not reach into your underwear to make – the remote does the real work.

The Sync’s on-toy controls are basic but usable. A single button cycles through 4 power levels and 6 vibration patterns on one loop, so dropping back to a gentler power means clicking through whatever patterns remain. I rarely want the patterns, but the 4 power levels cover the full range and keep the loop short enough for occasional use.

The button is easy to find by feel because it sits on the external arm, has a distinct feel, and does not require removing the toy. Pressing it can push the toy firmly against your pubic bone unless you brace the other side with a thumb, and the older slim button is a little less comfortable than We-Vibe’s newer rounder buttons, but is still workable.

I like the button most as a backup during sex. When I am warmed up and want more intensity, reaching between my legs for one click can be easier than reaching for the remote or opening the app.

The Moxie+’s magnet anchors the toy reliably to your underwear in bed, while walking, and during heavy exercise, but there’s some side-to-side swiveling.

The magnet is strong, but it’s a small disc at the top of a long toy without any body contouring. The magnet pins the clit-end securely and that point stays locked to your underwear. But the long, straight lower end has room to swing slightly side-to-side as I move. The more body-contouring shape of panty vibrators like the VeDO Niki and NS Novelties Techno Lucy reduces that side-to-side movement.

Underwear choice also matters across every activity – form-fitting underwear keeps the Moxie+ snug much better. With a looser pair, the magnet still holds, but the underwear itself can shift and move the toy with it.

In bed, with tight underwear, I could keep the Moxie+ in a good, stimulating position.

Standing, walking, or doing heavier activity like running/jumping is where it moves side-to-side more and the contact with my clit loosens a bit – something a lot of magnetic panty vibes do to some degree. The toy doesn’t drift sideways or come loose, but gravity pulls my underwear (and the toy with it) a bit away from my clit when I’m upright. Pulling everything up to sit closer to my body fixes it, but it’s an adjustment I make every so often.

In this section, I’ll cover the Sync’s fit for solo use in bed, walking around, and heavier movement. For fit during sex, see Hands-Free Use During Sex.

The Sync stays put well enough for bed and light activity, but wearing it around is still a secondary use. Its C-shape is designed to be worn during sex, not movement-heavy play.

The two adjustable hinges are very helpful in finding a good fit. One hinge sits at the base of the clit arm and one in the internal arm, and both hold the shape I press them into.

This is a huge difference from merely flexible couples vibrators, which don’t hold the shape you set. An adjustable hinge is essential in a couples vibrator because it lets me tighten the clit contact instead of hoping the toy’s default curve works. Flexible-only models like the Sync Go or Sync Lite shift off my clit immediately when I’m moving around.

But the adjustability is limited to angle. The fixed clit-arm length still matters: if that arm does not reach your clit, no hinge setting can fully solve it.

The Chorus also has two hinges, while the Sync 2 has one, but I can find a secure and stimulating fit with all 3.

In bed, the Sync does not shift when I roll side to side or onto my stomach. The internal arm is slimmer than egg vibrators so it can feel less-secure, but it has not slipped out for me.

During light activity, including walking, stairs, and chores, it stayed put. Snug underwear plus shorts are helpful if you’re out of bed and moving around. Heavier movement is where you’ll encounter issues: dancing, running, and high knees were fine, but jumping jacks made it wiggle loose far enough that I had to push it back up.

If active wear matters more than sex, the Sync O is more secure because its flexible loop anchors differently, though it is less stimulating during sex. For wearing arout of bed as the main use, an egg vibrator or magnetic panty vibrator is a better pick, but not wearable during sex.

The Moxie+ is comfortable without too much movement, but its firm, slim body delivers more focused pressure on my clit than broader panty vibrators – pleasant if you like a precise point of contact, potentially uncomfortable if you don’t.

In bed, the silicone surface is soft and smooth and doesn’t tap around too much. With no flex and a slim profile, the Moxie+ contacts a precise area for focused stimulation.

When I’m walking around, the same firm, straight shape shifts more than a broader or contoured toy would – particularly on stairs or when I’m going from sitting to standing. Sometimes this can feel more stimulating, but other times it’s uncomfortable. If you’re sensitive to overstimulation, the lack of control here may be overwhelming.

A broader panty vibrator with more even pressure is more consistently comfortable. Like the VeDO Niki (remote-controlled) and the NS Novelties Techno Lucy (app-controlled). Two more comfortable picks at a lower price.

This section covers comfort during solo use in bed and while wearing the Sync around. For comfort during sex, see Hands-Free Use During Sex.

The We-Vibe Sync is one of the most comfortable C-shaped couples vibrators I have tested. Its adjustable hinges let it sit snugly without clamping too hard, and neither arm pinches, pokes, or creates pressure that makes me want to remove it.

The external arm is broad enough to spread pressure across my body instead of concentrating it in one spot. The internal arm is slimmer than a large egg vibrator, so it does not add a distracting stretch, and the silicone feels smooth.

In bed, the Sync stays firmly against me without uncomfortable pressure. I can wear this much longer than an egg vibrator without feeling too stretched. Walking around, it does not jostle, rub, or make me change my gait.

The adjustable We-Vibe models are all strong here: the Chorus, Sync 2, and Sync O are similarly comfortable.

The We-Vibe Moxie+ is quiet.

Decibel readings on low and high were both too quiet for our Sound Level Meter to register. The ambient room noise was 35 dBA, and the Moxie+ never measured higher than that.

For our Background Noise Masking subtest, I wear the toy while my partner listens from three feet away and we play pink noise through a speaker at quiet, moderate, and loud volumes (56, 62, and 68 dBA). At our quiet audio (56 dB), every setting was masked except high – on high, my partner could just barely make out a low hum, and only when I held still. Once I started moving, even high became hard to discern.

At our moderate and loud volumes, every setting was fully masked. It’s also worth noting that every wearable I’ve tested, including the Moxie+, is audible in a fully silent room (no pink noise playing) – no matter how gentle and quiet its vibrations are.

For the closed-door test, my partner listens directly outside our bedroom door while I use the toy in bed. I use it as a handheld since wearing dampens sound and some people want the flexibility to safely re-position the toy or move it around – holding gives the most conservative results. My partner could not hear the Moxie+ on any power level.

It’s worth noting that the Moxie+ is quieter than the original Moxie. We’re uncertain whether that is a design upgrade, or if the Moxie just grew lounder over time.

If you want a panty vibrator that was fully masked by our quietest tested background level (56 dBA), consider the NS Novelties Techno Lucy (app-controlled) or VeDO Niki (remote-controlled).

The We-Vibe Sync is very quiet – in the most discreet group of wearables I have tested, and I can barely hear it while wearing it.

On low power, the Sync never rose above our room’s 35 dBA ambient noise, so the sound meter could not separate the toy from the room. On high, it measured about 42 dBA, which makes sense given the buzzier top end, and is still quiet. The Sync 2, which stays more neutral in vibration frequency is even quieter on high.

In our background-noise masking test, my partner listened from three feet away while I wore the toy and we played pink noise at 56, 62, and 68 dBA. He could not hear the Sync at any vibration strength under any of those conditions. In a silent room, it is audible, but every wearable vibrator we have tested is audible in a silent room.

Behind a closed door, the Sync passed easily. My partner heard nothing from outside the bedroom while I ran the toy through every power level and pattern. I held the toy for that test instead of wearing it because wearing dampens sound, so holding it gives the more conservative result.

Most hands-free couples vibrators we have tested are similarly discreet, including the Sync 2 and We-Vibe Chorus.

The Moxie+ has decent battery life – 85 minutes on its highest power in our test. If you specifically want a long battery life, go with the Lovense Ferri which lasted nearly twice as long (168 minutes).

The We-Vibe Sync lasted 85 minutes vibrating continuously on its highest power in our test. That is plenty for sex, and real use should last longer if you spend part of the session on lower settings.

It also outlasts the two pricier couples vibrators I also recommend: the Chorus lasted 65 minutes, and the Sync 2 lasted 63. The Sync O runs longer at 93 minutes, but it is less stimulating for me during sex.

Wearables designed specifically for out of bed use last longer, like the Lovense Ferri (168 minutes). But the Sync is plenty for use during sex.

The We-Vibe Moxie+ is fully IPX7 waterproof, so it’s very easy to clean. You can run it under a faucet or fully submerge it in soapy water without worry.

The We-Vibe Sync is very easy to clean. The toy itself is fully waterproof with an IPX7 rating, so you can rinse it under running water or fully submerge it in soapy water and scrub the arms, hinges, and charging contacts without worrying about damage. You can also take the toy into the bath.

The remote needs more care. It is IPX4 splashproof, which means it can only resist light splashes. Do not take the remote into the shower or clean it under a running faucet; wipe it with a damp towel instead.

The Moxie+ is solidly built. The body is nearly identical to the original We-Vibe Moxie – a smooth silicone coating over a firm core, with a moderate-strength magnet holding it to your underwear. The on-toy button is the older We-Vibe design, harder to press than the buttons on newer toys but still workable.

The We-Vibe Sync feels solidly built, though the remote feels cheaper than the toy. The toy itself is coated in smooth silicone, both hinges still hold firmly when I press them into position, and the joint between the two arms feels sturdy enough that I have never worried about snapping it.

The remote is the older hard-plastic We-Vibe version rather than the silicone remote that comes with the Sync 2. It feels less premium, and the buttons are a little tacky to press, but they work.

I’ve had my Sync since 2022 and it still works like it did when it was new. Nothing has loosened, and both hinges still hold the positions I set. It’s held up better than the pricier Chorus, whose internal arm stopped vibrating and hinges loosened at about the same age.