15% Off Order With Code "PleasureBetter15"Check Price
28% Off with Code PleasureBetter20Check Deal Price

Lelo Ida Wave vs We-Vibe Sync 2 Side-By-Side Comparison

Tested & Rated with Methodology v2.0 Updated: September 8, 2026
Tested & Rated with Methodology v2.0 Updated: September 8, 2026

Use Case Ratings

Overall7.48.0
Wearing Around6.78.0
Solo Use In Bed8.17.9
Long-Distance Play6.66.4

Performance Ratings

Stimulation During Sex N/A 8.5
Clit Stimulation 8.5 7.9
G-spot Stimulation 7.5 5.4
App Control 6.7 5.0
Remote Control N/A 7.8
Noise 8.5 9.3
Secure Fit 4.6 7.5
Adjustability 5.9 7.5
Battery Life 9.3 6.2
Comfort 6.0 10.0
Cleaning 10.0 10.0

Hands-Free Use During Sex


Hands-Free Stimulation During Sex Rating N/A 8.5
Lelo Ida Wave Flexibility Demo Photo 1
We-Vibe Sync 2 Adjustability Demo Photo - Extreme Position 1
Lelo Ida Wave Flexibility Demo Photo 2
We-Vibe Sync 2 Adjustability Demo Photo - Extreme Position 2
Secure Fit and Clit Contact During Sex N/A 9.1
Comfort During Sex N/A 8.5
Adjustment Type Flexible Hinged (Single Hinge)
Lelo Ida Wave Internal Arm Longitudinal Shape View Photo
We-Vibe Sync 2 Internal Arm Longitudinal Shape View Photo
Internal Arm Longitudinal Shape Slim Elongated Arm with Bulbous Section Slim Bulbous G-Spot Section

The We-Vibe Sync 2 is one of the few couples vibrators that reliably brings me to orgasm hands-free during sex.

It still takes more effort than my favorite handheld vibrators (like the Lovense Hyphy), but that’s true of every hands-free couples vibe: handhelds have bigger, stronger motors, and give you more control over placement and the ability to press as firmly as you want.

We-Vibe Sync 2 Adjustablility
The We-Vibe Sync 2’s adjustable hinge.

What makes the Sync 2 work for me anyway is its adjustable hinge. It lets me customize the shape to my body so the external motor stays in secure, consistent contact with my clit. It’s worth taking a minute to adjust the angle – when it’s opened too wide, the stimulation feels weaker, but once I dial in a tighter angle, I get a secure, stimulating fit that consistently brings me to orgasm hands-free.

We-Vibe Sync 2 with Flexible Only Couples Vibrators
The We-Vibe Sync 2 (left) with flexible-only couples vibrators (right), which are not stimulating enough. From left to right: Romp Join, We-Vibe Sync Lite, We-Vibe Sync Go, and Lelo Tiani 3.

Entry-level models (like the Romp Join, We-Vibe Sync Lite, and Sync Go) and even other brands’ premium models (like the Lelo Tiani 3) do not have this hinge – so these models shift off my clit immediately during sex, and I cannot orgasm with them.

We-Vibe Chorus and Sync 2 Adjustability
The We-Vibe Chorus’s two adjustable hinges (left) compared to the Sync 2’s single adjustable hinge (right).

But I orgasm reliably with the Sync 2, and I find it just as stimulating as the more expensive We-Vibe Chorus. The Sync 2’s motors are just as powerful as the Chorus’s. The main difference is that the Chorus has an additional hinge for an improved range of customization. While the extra hinge may improve some people’s experience, I personally find one hinge is sufficient.

I orgasm more easily with the Sync 2 during sex than with the comparably-priced We-Vibe Sync O. Because the Sync 2’s and Chorus’s G-spot motors are relatively gentle, I used to think the internal motor didn’t make much of a difference. However, after getting the Sync O (which lacks a motor in the G-spot arm), I’ve realized the motor and pronounced front-wall bump have a meaningful impact.

We-Vibe Sync O Internal Arm vs Sync 2 Internal Arm
The Sync O’s internal arm (left), which is not bulbous and without an internal motor, compared to the Sync 2’s internal arm (right), which has a pronounced front-wall bump and internal vibrations.

The added pressure and stimulation from the Sync 2’s bulbous internal arm pressing the vibrations into my G-spot as my partner thrusts helps me orgasm more easily than models without internal motors. But the G-spot arm’s still slim enough for comfortable penetration while wearing it – it adds a little extra tightness, but it’s not too much of a stretch. I don’t experience pinching, poking, or pain in any position.


Clit Stimulation: Main Takeaways


Clit Stimulation 8.5 7.9
Max Power Rating 8.1 6.9
Power Range Rating 9.0 7.9
Vibration Transfer Effectiveness Rating 8.9 8.9
Rumbliness Rating 8.2 7.8
Stimulation from Motion N/A N/A

In the next sections, I’ll cover the Ida Wave’s clit vibration power and rumbliness.

Here’s the main conclusion:

The Ida Wave has one of the best clit motors of any dual-stim wearable. It’s got the most rumbly clit motor of the dual-stim wearables I’ve tested, and has great power. It’s strong enough for me to orgasm hands-free, and while some others have even more strength, the broad external arm helps the vibrations reach my clit more effectively than many stronger toys.

Lelo Ida Wave showing how broad the clit arm is
Closeup on the Ida Wave’s broad external arm.

In the next sections, I’ll cover the Sync 2’s clit power, range, transfer effectiveness, and rumbliness in-depth.

Here’s the main conclusion:

The We-Vibe Sync 2 is tied with the Chorus and Sync Original for the most stimulating clit vibrations from a couples vibrator – I orgasm equally easily hands-free with any of those three. It stays in secure contact with my body and is more rumbly than most wearables, both of which help the vibrations reach my clit effectively.

We-Vibe Sync Original Sync 2 and Chorus
The We-Vibe Sync 2 (middle) has similar clit stimulation to the original Sync (left) and Chorus (right).

Its only moderately powerful compared to stronger panty vibrators or handheld vibrators, so those are more intense options if hands-free stimulaton during sex isn’t your priority.


Clit Vibrations: Power, Range, and Transfer Effectiveness


Max Power Rating 8.1 6.9
Power Range Rating 9.0 7.9
Vibration Transfer Effectiveness Rating 8.9 8.9
Power vs Frequency Graph
How Strong Is Each Power? 

The Ida Wave has strong clit vibrations – strong enough for me to orgasm hands-free. Its ten power levels span from a very gentle 1.0 up to 8.5 out of 10, with gradual steps for a comfortable, slow build.

The vibrations transfer really well to my clit too. With hands-free vibrators, the toy’s shape and fit have to naturally carry the motor’s strength to your body. The Ida Wave’s design does this very well: the tight angle of the internal arm pushes the clit arm firmly against my body, and the broad shape distributes this pressure evenly and consistently (and very comfortably).

Ida Wave Internal and External Arm
The tight angle between the internal arm (left) and external arm (right) presses the external arm’s motor tightly, but comfortably against the clit.

Of the dual-stim wearables I’ve tested, the Lovense Dolce and Lovense Flexer reach higher raw top powers, but neither delivers their power to the clit as effectively as the Ida Wave.

The Sync 2’s clit motor has a broad power range, starting gently and reaching 6.75 out of 10 on high. That’s moderate for wearable vibrators overall, but tied for the strongest hands-free couples vibrator I’ve tested – the Chorus, Sync 2, and original Sync offer nearly identical clit stimulation.

During sex, its strength and fit make it one of only a few couples vibrators I orgasm with easily and reliably. The adjustable hinge keeps the external motor pressed against my clit instead of letting it shift away, so the Sync 2 transfers its power better than most couples vibrators.

For solo wear or wearing around, the clit motor still feels stimulating because the hinge keeps it in decent contact. But without penetration adding pressure it feels only moderate. I’d treat those uses as a nice bonus – if wearable clit stimulation outside sex is your main goal, a stronger panty vibrator is usually a better fit.

A panty vibrator like the Lovense Ferri has a stronger clit motor than any couples vibrator, including the Sync 2. Click the name of any toy or motor here at the bottom of the graph to remove it from the graph.

Couples vibrators have to stay slim enough for comfortable penetration, so they’re generally less intense than other wearable clit toys like panty vibes and handheld vibrators. Handhelds also let you control exact placement and pressure.

While I orgasm with the Sync 2 hands-free during sex, not everyone will be able to. If you typically need substantial intensity, you may prefer a handheld toy like the Lovense Hyphy or a wand vibrator.

Adjustable Couples Vibrators vs Non Adjustable Couple Vibrators
Adjustable couples vibrators like the We-Vibe Sync 2 and Chorus on the left are stimulating enough for me to orgasm. But non-adjustable models like the Romp Join, Sync Lite, Sync Go, and Lelo Tiani 3 on the right are not stimulating enough.

Compared with other couples vibrators the Sync 2 is one of the strongest and most effective. Cheaper couples vibrators like the Romp Join, Sync Lite, and Sync Go – and even premium options like the Lelo Tiani 3 – have weaker vibrations and no adjustable hinge to keep the clit motor positioned well.

We-Vibe’s premium adjustable models are by far the most stimulating couples vibrators I’ve tested, and the Sync 2 is the most affordable current model that reliably works for me.


Clit Vibrations: Frequency (Rumbliness)


Rumbliness Rating 8.2 7.8
Power vs Frequency Graph
Frequency on Low Power 46.5 Hz 38.4 Hz
Median Frequency 68.1 Hz 65.6 Hz
Frequency on High Power 83.8 Hz 89.6 Hz
Rumbliness & Power Balance 8.8 7.5
Beat Sensation N/A 9.5

We rate wearables with rumbly vibrations higher than buzzy ones because rumbly is what most people prefer. But it’s definitely a personal preference, so consider what you like.

The Ida Wave’s clit motor is one of the most rumbly of my dual-stimulation wearables. Its lowest power setting is extremely rumbly at 46 Hz, the middle of its range is moderately rumbly at 68 Hz, and its top setting reaches neutral at 84 Hz – it never crosses into buzzy territory. My other dual-stim wearables are buzzier: the Lovense Dolce starts rumbly on low (49 Hz) but climbs into extremely buzzy at its top, and the Lovense Flexer is extremely buzzy at every power level.

The Ida Wave has a more rumbly clit motor than the Dolce (click on the Dolce’s G-spot motor under the graph to remove it from the graph and show only the clit motors).

Rumbly vibrations travel deeper into your body and tend to feel less ticklish than buzzy ones, which is part of why many people prefer them. While I can orgasm just as well from buzzy wearables as rumbly ones, the Ida Wave will be best for those who prioritize rumbliness.

We rate rumbly vibrations higher than buzzy ones because most people prefer vibrations that feel deeper and less surface-level. But this is still a personal preference – many people enjoy buzzier vibrations too.

The Sync 2’s clit motor is unusually rumbly for a wearable. Its lowest setting is extremely rumbly at around 38 Hz, the middle settings stay moderately rumbly, and even the highest setting only becomes neutral, just under 90 Hz. It never crosses into buzzy vibrations. The Chorus Pro, Chorus, and Sync 2 clit motors are all pretty comparably rumbly.

We-Vibe Sync 2 with We-Vibe Chorus Pro and We-Vibe Chorus
The Sync 2 (left), Chorus Pro (middle) and original Chorus (right) all have similarly rumbly clit motors.

That rumbliness really helps because wearable vibrators have less pressure and placement control than handheld toys. Rumbly vibes travel deeper through your body, which helps the Sync 2 feel more stimulating even though it doesn’t apply as much pressure as I’d normally get from a handheld vibe.

The Sync 2 also has a noticeable low, rhythmic tapping sensation layered over the steady vibrations, making the clit motor feel deeper and more rumbly than its raw frequency suggests. It stands out most on the lower and middle settings – I wish the tapping stayed stronger at the highest settings, but it becomes more noticeable when both motors run together – especially with one arm on low and the other on high.


G-spot Stimulation: Main Takeaways


G-spot Stimulation 7.5 5.4
Max Power Rating N/A 5.9
Power Range Rating N/A 5.4
Vibration Transfer Effectiveness Rating N/A 5.9
Rumbliness Rating N/A 4.5
Stimulation from Motion 7.5 N/A

In the next sections, I’ll cover the Sync 2’s G-spot power, range, transfer effectiveness, and rumbliness in-depth.

Here’s the main conclusion:

The We-Vibe Sync 2’s G-spot stimulation is minimal on its own, but helpful during sex.

Its internal motor is mild and buzzy, which is normal for hands-free couples vibrators since the arm has to stay slim enough for comfortable penetration. But during sex, the bulbous internal arm gets pushed more firmly into my G-spot as my partner thrusts, adding stimulating pressure.

We-Vibe Sync 2 with Lovense Lush 4 and Lovense Dolce and We-Vibe Sync O
The We-Vibe Sync 2 (far left) with an egg vibrator (middle left), the Lovense Dolce (middle right), and We-Vibe Sync O (far right).

So if you want strong, rumbly G-spot vibrations for solo play, choose an egg vibrator or larger dual-stimulation toy like the Lovense Dolce instead. But for a couples vibrator worn during sex, the Sync 2’s G-spot arm adds helpful front-wall pressure and makes orgasming easier for me than clit-only models like the We-Vibe Sync O.


G-spot Vibrations: Power, Range, and Transfer Effectiveness


Max Power Rating N/A 5.9
Power Range Rating N/A 5.4
Vibration Transfer Effectiveness Rating N/A 5.9
Power vs Frequency Graph
How Strong Is Each Power? 

The Sync 2’s G-spot motor is very mild, reaching about 2.75 out of 10 which is normal for hands-free couples vibrators.

It’s much weaker than dedicated G-spot egg vibrators or large dual-stimulation wearables like the Lovense Dolce which are not intended to wear during sex.

Internal Arms of We-Vibe Sync 2 and Lovense Lush 4 and Lovense Dolce
The slimmer arm of the Sync 2 (left) is weaker than an egg vibrator like the Lovense Lush 4 (middle) or Lovense Dolce (right). But it can be worn during sex, unlike the others, which are meant to be worn with no additional penetration.

The internal arm of a couples vibrator has to be slim enough to leave space for comfortable penetration, so it can’t use a large, powerful motor. Its main job is not to provide intense G-spot vibrations on its own – it’s to anchor the toy and add pressure against the front wall during sex.

We-Vibe Sync 2 and We-Vibe Sync Lite Internal Arm Side View
The thicker internal arm of the Sync 2 (left) add more pressure and stimulation than slimmer arms, like the We-Vibe Sync Lite’s (right).

On its own, the G-spot motor feels weak and not especially G-spot-focused. But during penetration, the Sync 2’s bulbous internal arm gets pushed more firmly into my G-spot as my partner thrusts, making the stimulation feel much more impactful. That’s why the Sync 2 feels more stimulating to me during sex than clit-only models like the Sync O, even though the G-spot motor itself is mild.

We-Vibe Sync O Internal Arm vs Sync 2 Internal Arm
The Sync 2’s more bulbous internal arm (right) compared to the Sync O’s slimmer, less-stimulating internal arm (left).

If strong solo G-spot vibration is your priority, I’d choose an egg vibrator like the Lovense Lush 4 or We-Vibe Jive 2 instead. If you’re looking for a couples vibrator to wear during sex, the Sync 2’s bulbous G-spot arm provides the helpful front-wall pressure you want during PIV.


G-spot Vibrations: Frequency (Rumbliness)


Rumbliness Rating N/A 4.5
Power vs Frequency Graph
Frequency on Low Power N/A 86.8 Hz
Median Frequency N/A 154.7 Hz
Frequency on High Power N/A 189.9 Hz
Rumbliness & Power Balance N/A 4.1
Beat Sensation N/A 9.5

The We-Vibe Sync 2’s G-spot vibrations are buzzy – typical for hands-free couples vibrators since the internal motor has to be very small.

While its lowest settings are neutral the middle and higher settings quickly become extremely buzzy, with a median frequency around 155 Hz. When using the Sync 2 for solo stimulation, the buzzy vibrations mean you won’t feel the G-spot stimulation much. Buzzy vibrations don’t travel through your body as effectively, and the G-spot is less sensitive than the clit. So if the vibrations are buzzy, you typically need more power to compensate.

But I don’t consider this a major problem for the Sync 2’s main purpose – stimulating you during sex. When my partner thrusts, the internal arm pushes into my G-spot and that pressure is what makes the stimulation meaningful, while the vibrations only add subtle enhancement.

We-Vibe Sync 2 Internal Arm Paired with Penetration
Penetration presses the bump-out against the G-spot for added stimulation using pressure more than vibrations.

So if you want strong, rumbly G-spot vibrations on their own, larger egg vibrators are better. But for a couples vibrator worn during sex, the Sync 2’s G-spot arm still adds enough pressure and stimulation to make orgasming easier for me – no couples vibrator’s G-spot arm is strong and rumbly.


G-spot Stimulation from Motion


Stimulation from Motion Rating 7.5 N/A
Target Accuracy 9.0 N/A
Motion Under Load 7.5 N/A
Motion Type Rotation (Orbital Shaft) N/A
Max Speed 68 CPM N/A
Min Speed 22 CPM N/A

I really enjoy the Ida Wave’s G-spot motion and it hits my G-spot well, but it’s somewhat subtle – like gentle fingering. It adds depth to my orgasms driven by the clit motor, but isn’t the main event on its own.

This rotational motion is one of my favorites, because this angle can direct pressure against the front wall where my G-spot is. Of the motion-based wearables I’ve tested, the Ida Wave hits the G-spot best: the “fingering” motion of the Lovense Flexer actually creates more clit movement than internal movement. And in-and-out thrusting toys like the Lovense Vulse feel good but don’t press on my G-spot specifically. The Ida Wave’s motion is also more stimulating than the Lelo Hula Beads which have too little range of motion to reach my G-spot reliably.

The different motion types of the Lelo Ida Wave, Lovense Flexer, Lovense Vulse and Lelo Hula Beads.

The stimulation is on the gentle side because the internal arm is flexible, so the pressure is light. If you like substantial force on your G-spot, handheld G-spot toys like the We-Vibe Nova 2 or Lovense Nora allow for much more leveraging pressure. But what I enjoy about the Ida Wave is that it’s effortless.

Lelo Ida Wave and Lovense Nora - two rotating remote control vibrators

I can let the clit vibrations bring me to orgasm hands-free while the G-spot motion makes the orgasm stronger and more full.


App Control: Main Takeaways


App Control 6.7 5.0
Close-Range Features Rating 6.2 5.6
Long-Distance Features Rating 2.6 4.0
Close-Range Connectivity Rating 7.8 5.0
Long-Distance Connectivity Rating 7.4 4.3

In the next sections, I’ll cover the Lelo app’s close-range features, long-distance features, and connectivity in detail.

Here’s the main conclusion: Lelo’s app is clean, easy to use, and reliable, but it’s basic compared with the best vibrator apps.

Lelo Ida Wave Close Range Play Options in App
The control options available in the Lelo app during Close Range play.

Close-range and long-distance controls works well for adjusting intensity, choosing preset patterns, or controlling power through your phone’s movement. But there’s no custom pattern creation, sound sync, multi-toy control, or independent control over each motor. Long-distance connections are reliable, but the experience is bare-bones with no video calling or photo sharing. Bluetooth connectivity is solid during normal use, though heavy body interference can cause dropouts.

If basic, reliable control is enough and you primarily want the Ida Wave for its comfortable motion and rumbly clit vibrations, the app works well. If a feature-rich app and engaging long-distance experience are priorities, go with a Lovense dual-stimulation wearable like the Lovense Dolce or the Lovense Flexer if you still want motion.

In the next sections, I’ll cover the We-Vibe app’s close-range features, long-distance features, and connectivity in detail.

Here’s the main conclusion: The We-Vibe app is buggy and bad – far behind Lovense’s app. But for hands-free stimulation during sex, I usually prefer the physical remote or on-toy button anyway. The app is a downside, but not a dealbreaker because We-Vibe still makes the only couples vibrators I reliably orgasm with.

In close-range control, the We-Vibe app has ongoing bugs that affect several products, including the Sync 2. The controls often freeze, and the app caps the intensity to about 73% of the Sync 2’s true top strength. Long-distance control also has a bug that often blocks you from connecting at all.

Some of the issues encountered in the We-Vibe app. While these won’t all happen every time, the unreliability is frustrating. The Sync 2 has a remote as a backup, which is helpful since the app is not something you can count on.

If app control matters more than hands-free stimulation during sex, go with a Lovense toy instead: the Lovense Ferri for clit stimulation, Lovense Lush 4 for G-spot stimulation, or Lovense Dolce for dual-stimulation.


App Control: Close-Range Features


Close-Range Features Rating 6.2 5.6
Core Control Depth & Customization 6.8 5.4
Constant Setting Control Basic Strong (With a Noteable Bug)
Preset Pattern Control Basic Strong (With a Noteable Bug)
Pattern Creation & Saving None Poor
Multi-Function Coverage & Independence Basic Strong
Multi-Toy Control & Independence None (Not Supported) Basic
UX Clarity & Efficiency 8.0 5.9
Sound and Music Control 0.0 7.0
Music Sync Availability None Local Music Only
Sound Reactive Control None Basic
Other Bonus Features 7.5 0.0
Noteworthy Bonus Modes Motion Control None noteworthy

The Lelo app’s close-range features are clean, easy to use, and work well – but they’re very basic. It’s essentially a glorified remote control which can be good if you like simplicity.

You can adjust intensity, choose preset patterns, and use Lelo’s unique motion-control feature like their physical remotes provide. But it lacks the advanced features better apps offer, like custom pattern creation, music/sound sync, separate control over each motor, and the ability to control multiple toys at once.

Lelo Ida Wave Manual Mode in App
Manual Mode in the Lelo app.

Manual mode is just a picture of Lelo’s remote and + / − buttons to raise or lower intensity. It works well, but with 10 power levels, it takes lots of repeated taps to reach high power. Better apps like Lovense’s feel smoother because you can tap or drag directly to the intensity you want instead of clicking a button several times.

Lelo Ida Wave Screwing Mode in App
Screwing mode adjusts intensity based on how far you twist/tilt your phone.

For faster intensity changes, use the Screwing mode. This adjusts the toy’s power based on your phone’s tilt – level for gentle vibrations, closer to 90 degrees for stronger. This is also a great way to control your toy without staring at a screen.

Lelo Ida Wave Shaking Mode in App
Shaking mode adjusts intensity based on how fast you shake your phone.

Shaking changes intensity based on how hard you shake the phone, but I think it takes too much energy, so it’s not very useful.

Lelo Two Motor Patterns in App
Patterns available in the Lelo app.

On all 3 screens, you can select a pattern and control its intensity. The pattern names are vague like “Delighted” or “Overjoyed” instead of descriptive like “Waves” or “Pulses”. And the app shows small waveform icons for each motor, but you don’t see them until you’ve selected the pattern. So you have to select and try each pattern to know what it feels like.

It’s missing more advanced functionality other apps provide. There’s no custom pattern creation, no music or sound-reactive control, no multi-toy control, and no individual control over each motor. Each pattern in the Ida Wave’s app assigns a preset waveform to both motors, and some Modes give the clit and G-spot motors different patterns. But any intensity adjustment applies to both motors together, so you can’t turn up the clit vibrations while keeping the G-spot motion slow for example. Better apps like Lovense allow individual control of each motor.

One small annoyance: the app requires an account even for close-range solo use. It usually stays logged in, but it sometimes signs me out, which is frustrating when I’m ready to use the toy.

For simple, reliable close-range control, the Ida Wave’s app is good. But if you want more advanced app features, the Lovense Dolce is a good dual-stimulation wearable with a better app.

The We-Vibe app’s close-range features are weak because the app is so buggy. If it worked properly, it would be a decent option for simple intensity control and preset patterns. But the current experience is frustrating.

We-Vibe Sync 2 Single Vibe Mode
Single Vibe mode.

The main controls are Single Vibe and Multi Vibe. Both let you drag an on-screen dot up or down to adjust intensity. Multi Vibe also lets you assign preset patterns to four corners, so you can quickly switch between steady vibration and a few favorite patterns without digging through menus. On both screens, you can adjust the clit and G-spot motors together or control them independently. The design is simple and convenient in theory.

We-Vibe Sync 2 Multi Vibe Mode
Multi Vibe mode.

But most newer We-Vibe toys, including the Sync 2, have bugs on these screens. Even when the app shows 100% power, the Sync 2 only reaches about 73% of the strength that you’d get from the remote or on-toy button. The strongest app setting still feels good, but you need the remote for the toy’s true top power. The original Sync does not have this bug.

The control dot also sometimes freezes or stops responding – this happens even more often when you try to control the two motors independently.

We-Vibe Single Motor Pattern Library
Pattern options in the We-Vibe App.

There are 10 preset patterns you can choose from in Single or Multi Vibe mode, each with a name and waveform icon. Some are easy to understand, like Pulse and Wave, while others are less clear. There’s also a Playlist feature for stringing patterns together, but you can’t feel what you’re building as you make it, so it’s mostly guesswork.

We-Vibe Two Motor Pattern Creation
Custom Pattern creation is clunky and you can’t feel the vibrations as you draw them out.

Custom pattern creation is poor. It’s hidden several taps away from the main control screens, and you can’t feel the pattern while drawing it. You have to draw the waveform, save and name it, return to the control screen, select it, and only then test how it feels. The patterns are also limited by your screen width, so they come out short and choppy. My partner’s custom pattern played, but mine crashed the app repeatedly.

We-Vibe Two Motor Beat Mode
Beat Mode

The sound and music modes are okay. Sound Mode uses your phone’s mic, while Beat Mode syncs to songs saved locally on your phone – not Spotify or Apple Music. Both work, but the controls are poorly labeled, and there’s no minimum-volume threshold like Lovense offers, which is helpful in preventing your toy from vibrating until the sounds around you are loud enough.

For close-range control, I’d use the Sync 2’s remote instead of the app. If you mainly want excellent app control, Lovense is much better – choose the Lovense Ferri for clit stimulation, the Lovense Lush 4 for G-spot stimulation, or the Lovense Dolce for dual stimulation. But none of those are couples vibrators to wear during sex. We-Vibe makes the only good couples vibrators I can orgasm with, so if that’s your goal, the Sync 2 is still worth choosing – I’d just skip the app and use the remote.


App Control: Long-Distance Features


Long-Distance Features Rating 2.6 4.0
Core Control During Video/Voice Calls N/A 4.0
Video/Voice Call Tools & Experience N/A 4.0
Core Control During Messaging 6.8 4.0
Messaging Tools & Experience 5.9 4.0
UX Clarity & Efficiency (Long-Distance) 6.5 4.0
Mutual Partner Control Mutual Mutual
Partner Settings & Management 0.0 5.6
Saved Partners None Multiple partners
Auto-Accept Control Requests No auto-accept options No auto-accept options
Hide Online Status N/A For everyone
Partner Online Notifications None None
Anonymous & Social Experience 2.5 0.0
Anonymous Control Methods Anonymous room None
Block / Report Tools No block/report tools No block/report tools
Group Control Support No No

Lelo’s long-distance experience is very basic.

It works for offering a partner simple, reliable control of your toy from anywhere in the world, but it doesn’t have the communication features that make long-distance feel more like sharing an experience together: no video or voice calls, no saved partners, no photo or voice messaging, no custom pattern creation, and you can only send text messages when you’re both in an active session.

Lelo App Create or Join a Room
You have to create a new room each time you want to share control.

To start, you create a new Room and send your partner the code outside the app. That’s fine for one-off sessions, but you have to create a new room every time. There are no saved partner profiles, online status, auto-accept settings, or permissions. So with a regular partner, you have to start from scratch each time.

Lelo Ida Wave App Long Distance Call Controls
Your partner’s control options and view during a “call” – there is no video call option.

Once connected, the controlling partner gets a version of the same Play screen used for close-range control: they will use the Manual mode, and the Screwing/Shaking motion modes to contol your toy. Lelo does add two useful long-distance controls: a drag-to-position dot for setting intensity quickly, and a voice-control mode that changes power based on sound picked up by the phone’s mic. Both make it quicker to set a specific intensity than tapping + / − repeatedly.

Lelo App Text Messaging During Long Distance Call
You can send text messages back and forth during a call, but the message history is not saved, so you can’t see it anymore after the call is over.

But it lacks lots of communication features that make most long-distance toys feel fun and connecting. There’s only text messaging, with no message history once the room ends, so you can’t go back and reread fun messages. Video or voice calls have to happen in another app, like FaceTime or Zoom. But if you each have a Lelo toy, you can each control the other’s toy.

If long-distance play is a priority, the Lovense Dolce or Lovense Flexer is the better dual-stim wearable. Lovense has in-app video, messaging, saved partners, permission settings, and detailed controls so your partner can make custom patterns. Lelo is fine for basic control-sharing, but Lovense is much stronger for ongoing partner play.

The We-Vibe app’s long-distance features are too buggy to recommend.

The design is decent in theory, but persistent connection and control issues make long-distance play unreliable. If long-distance control matters there are no good couples vibrators specifically – you’re better off with a different type of wearable. The Lovense Ferri for clit stimulation, the Lovense Lush 4 for G-spot stimulation, or the Lovense Dolce for dual stimulation are better long-distance options.

We-Vibe Sync 2 Long Distance Call and Controls
Your partner’s control options and view during a video call.

Long-distance control in We-Vibe’s app is supposed to work like close-range control. Your partner gets the same Single Vibe, Multi Vibe, and Touch screens to control your Sync 2, and you can control their toy the same way. You can also take back control of your own toy mid-session without ending the call, which is a useful feature.

But the same close-range bugs carry over. Your partner still can’t reach the Sync 2’s full power from the app, and the control dot sometimes freezes or stops responding.

Long-distance has extra bugs too. Most importantly, both partners often show as “offline” even when you’re both in the app, which prevents you from starting a session at all.

We-Vibe Glitch Partner Offline
The We-Vibe app can sometimes incorrectly show your partner as “offline”, which prevents a session from even starting.

Even when it does connect, starting a video call is clunky. You have to send and accept four separate requests: the call, camera access, control of your toy, and control of theirs. The video feed is blurry and choppy compared to Lovense.

We-Vibe Chat Options in App
Your chat options in Long Distance mode.

Chat works as a basic messenger, with text, photos, voice notes, and video clips. We-Vibe does let you save multiple partners, but it doesn’t offer Lovense’s anonymous one-time control links or auto-accept settings for trusted partners.

For long-distance play, a Lovense toy like the Ferri, Lush 4, or Dolce is far better, but they don’t have any couples vibrators to wear during sex.


App Control: Connectivity


Close-Range Connectivity Rating 7.8 5.0
Long-Distance Connectivity Rating 7.4 4.3
Bluetooth Connection & Response Reliability 7.5 4.0
Body Interference Signal Robustness 5.9 10.0
Light Interference Position Workable Stable
Moderate Interference Position Unreliable Stable
Heavy Interference Position Unreliable Stable
Control Reliability with No Interference 10.0 9.0
Connection Reliability General Experience Commands typically take effect reliably Frequent command misses (regular frustration)
Bluetooth Pairing Ease 8.5 7.1
Typical Pairing Workflow 3+ in‑app actions to connect 2 in‑app actions to connect
Typical Pairing Success Rate 10.0 7.5
Bluetooth Reconnection Ease 5.9 5.0
Perceived Delay Feels instant Noticeable delay (affects flow)
Max Bluetooth Range 215 ft 50 ft
Long-Distance
Long-Distance Session Start Ease & Reliability 7.5 4.0
Long-Distance Connection & Response Reliability 7.0 4.0

The Ida Wave’s close-range Bluetooth is good for solo use: pairing is reliable, commands consistently go through, and the range is strong – 215 feet in our test without any blockage. It can be sensitive to too much body tissue coming between the phone and toy, but this doesn’t happen much in normal use.

The first time you connect, you’ll add the toy to your list which takes a few clicks. After that first one-time pairing, I just tap the toy from the My Toy list, tap Play, and it connects within a few seconds.

The Ida Wave stays connected well when the phone and toy have a clear path, but Bluetooth struggles when a lot of body tissue sits between them. In our body-interference test, it handled light body interference but dropped at the two harder angles with more material blocking the signal.

For most people this won’t really be an issue with the Ida Wave. Our test runs harsher than real wear. The Ida Wave’s receiver is in the external arm and often will have a relatively clear shot – especially since this toy is best in bed rather than wearing around where your partner might be at an odd angle like controlling your toy from behind you.

Lelo Ida Wave On-Toy Controls Photo
To re-pair, you often have to press the on-toy button.

If the connection drops between your phone and the toy, the app won’t automatically reconnect when the signal returns. You have to go back to the toy’s connection page, and press the physical button on the Ida Wave itself to re-pair. Since the button’s on the external arm, it’s not much trouble, but still takes effort.

Connecting in long-distance mode through a “room” is reliable because your partner’s phone isn’t talking directly to the toy. Your phone controls the Ida Wave over Bluetooth, and your partner’s phone connects to yours over Wi-Fi or cell data. As long as your phone stays near the toy and both internet connections are decent, the long-distance connection works well.

One small long-distance quirk: if the controlling partner locks their phone or leaves the app for more than about 30 seconds, they drop out of the Room and have to re-enter the code. The wearer’s connection doesn’t drop – control just pauses until they rejoin.

For most typical uses, the Ida Wave’s connection is solid. But if the best connectivity is important to you, the Lovense Dolce or Flexer is a better pick. They handle tougher body-blocking angles better, and are stronger overall for app-controlled play.

The We-Vibe app’s connectivity with the Sync 2 is poor in close range and broken in long distance. The issue isn’t the Bluetooth signal – it’s the app, so it affects all We-Vibe’s couples vibrators including the Chorus, Chorus Pro, Sync O, and others. You’ll want to control the Sync 2 from the remote.

The Sync 2’s Bluetooth hardware is fine. It has reasonable range and handles body interference well. But the app causes unreliable reconnection, missed commands, and long-distance bugs that make long-distance play unusable. If app control is a priority, the Lovense Ferri, Lush 4, or Dolce are much more reliable.

We-Vibe Reconnection Prompts
As shown here with the We-Vibe Jive Lite, the app walks you through each prompt to connect your toy.

Initial pairing is simple. Once you add the Sync 2 to the app, it usually reconnects in two taps with no on-toy action needed. This works fine if you use one phone and only have one or two We-Vibe toys.

The problems start if you switch between several We-Vibe toys or connect the same toy to multiple phones. Then quick-connect can fail, and the fix often requires deleting the toy from the app, forgetting it in your phone’s Bluetooth settings, and pairing it again.

Reconnection during play is inconsistent. If the signal drops and returns within 10-20 seconds, the app usually reconnects automatically. But during that gap, the app may still look connected, so your partner can be “controlling” the toy while nothing is actually happening. If you’re out of range longer, you may need to reconnect manually, sometimes by holding the on-toy button – awkward if you’re wearing it.

We-Vibe Sync 2 On-Toy Controls Photo
Sometimes re-pairing involves pressing the on-toy button again, which can be awkward if you’re wearing it.

Even when the connection holds, commands often miss. On the Single Vibe and Multi Vibe screens, the toy may not respond when you drag the control dot, or it may freeze up completely. These misses are intermittent, but frequent enough that I don’t trust the app.

The Sync 2 holds up to body interference well. Our test simulates nearby partner control where your body sits at three increasingly difficult angles, between the phone and toy. Many wearables lose connection at the hardest angle because water-rich body tissue weakens Bluetooth more than walls or clothes. The Sync 2 stayed connected through all three. Its open-air max range was also fine at 50 feet.

We-Vibe Glitch Partner Offline
Sometimes the app incorrectly shows your partner as “offline”, in which case, you cannot start a call or message at all.

Long-distance play is more problematic than the close range issues. Both partners often show as “offline” even when they’re in the app, preventing sessions from starting at all. When sessions do connect, control commands often stop affecting the toys. Both bugs happen regularly, and there’s no reliable fix.

For dependable app connectivity in close-range or long-distance play, the Lovense Ferri, Lush 4, or Dolce are better choices – but We-Vibe is the only brand with good couples vibrators.


Remote Control: Main Takeaways


Remote Control N/A 7.8
Features Rating N/A 8.7
Connectivity Rating N/A 7.3

The Lelo Ida Wave doesn’t include a physical remote control. A remote lets you adjust the toy by feel – without pulling out your phone. Though there’s other downsides like less depth and no visual feedback to help your partner know what your toy’s doing. If you want to consider options with physical remotes, see our recommendations in these guides:

In the next sections, I’ll cover the Sync 2’s remote features and connectivity in detail.

Here’s the main conclusion: the Sync 2’s remote has all the controls you need and works reliably without much body interference. It can become unreliable when too much of your body comes between the toy and remote (like when your partner is controlling your toy from a sharp angle), but that doesn’t actually come into play when you’re controlling the toy yourself or during sex (which is what the Sync 2 is best for).


Remote Control: Features


Remote Control Features Rating N/A 8.7
We-Vibe Sync 2 Remote Control Labeled Button Layout
Control Interface N/A 9.3
Vibration Power Control Method N/A Dedicated +/- Buttons (Clickable)
Vibration Pattern Control Method N/A Dedicated +/- Buttons
Different Arm Control Independence N/A Linked
Can Adjust Pattern Intensity? N/A Yes
Bonus Control Style N/A None
Partner Feedback N/A Input Confirmation Only (Blink / Pulse)
Remote Control Comfort N/A 9.5
Remote Power Source N/A (1) CR2032

The We-Vibe Sync 2’s remote features are great.

One of the best aspects is that the power and pattern controls are separate. There’s dedicated + and − buttons to move forward and backward through 11 power levels. And pressing and holding either button helps you reach a higher or lower setting faster.

There’s forward and backward buttons to move through the 6 vibration patterns. So I never have to cycle past patterns to reach a power level or vice versa – many remotes put power and patterns on the same loop. And you can raise and lower the intensity of each pattern.

Wearables Remotes Size Comparison
The Sync 2’s remote is 5th from the left, and is a nice size to hold in your hand or slip in your pocket.

The remote itself is comfortable to hold. It’s small and silicone-coated sitting naturally in my hand and feels more luxurious than the original Sync’s hard plastic remote. And I also find its smaller size more comfortable to hold than the Chorus’s and Chorus Pro’s larger remotes. And the buttons are raised enough that I can feel which is which without looking – this kind of eyes-free operation can be a practical advantage of a remote over an app.

Like most remotes, the Sync 2’s remote just blinks when a button is pressed – there’s no way for the partner holding it to tell what setting your toy is on. It’s not a huge deal, especially if you’re often the one controlling your own toy. But for a controlling partner, it can feel less engaging than an app’s visual feedback.


Remote Control: Connectivity


Remote Control Connectivity Rating N/A 7.3
Body Interference Signal Robustness N/A 5.9
Light Interference Position N/A Workable
Moderate Interference Position N/A Unreliable
Heavy Interference Position N/A Unreliable
Remote Control Responsiveness N/A 9.5
Control Reliability with No Interference N/A 10.0
Perceived Delay N/A Barely Perceptible
Typical Reconnection Workflow N/A Instant/Automatic
Max Remote Range N/A 38 ft

The Sync 2’s remote connectivity is decent. It’s good when controlling it yourself or during sex. But more clicks don’t go through when body interference comes into play, which can happen more when a partner controls your toy while you’re wearing it around.

The remote’s signal can become unreliable when too much of your body sits between the controller and the toy – RF and Bluetooth signals are affected by water-rich materials like your body. Our body-interference test simulates this at three progressively challenging angles, and it’s intentionally more conservative than actual use.

The Sync 2 missed occasional commands in the first position, but but started having more frequent misses in the other two positions. This is one area where the We-Vibe Chorus is better than the Sync 2. The Chorus’s remote held a stable connection without dropping any commands under body interference.

We-Vibe Sync 2 and Chorus with Remotes
The We-Vibe Chorus’s remote (right) is a little more reliable than the Sync 2’s (left) if body interference is high.

But this doesn’t really happen when controlling the Sync 2 yourself or during sex (what this toy’s best for), where the remote is very close to you and there’s a pretty clear shot from the remote to the toy. It’s more likely to come up if your partner controls it while you’re wearing it around, especially from an awkward angle where more of your body sits between the remote and the toy.

Button presses register with barely any delay – the toy reacts as soon as I release the button, so adjustments feel responsive. There’s effectively no reconnection routine either: a quick press of any button wakes the remote when it’s been idle. If you go out of range, it reconnects automatically when you come back into range.

The remote reached about 38 feet in our open-air range test, measured with clear line-of-sight and no body interference. That’s shorter than many wearable remotes we’ve tested, but it still easily covers same-room use.


On-Toy Controls


On-Toy Controls Rating 6.9 5.9
Lelo Ida Wave On-Toy Controls Photo
We-Vibe Sync 2 On-Toy Controls Photo
Control Interface 5.9 5.2
Vibration Power Control Method Single Button Cycle Loop (Shared) Single Button Cycle Loop (Shared)
Vibration Pattern Control Method Single Button Cycle Loop (Shared) Single Button Cycle Loop (Shared)
Motion Intensity Control Method Single Button Cycle Loop (Shared) N/A
Motion Pattern Control Method N/A N/A
Different Arm Control Independence Linked Linked
Can Adjust Pattern Intensity? No No
On-Toy Control Comfort 10.0 8.0

Like most wearables, the Ida Wave’s on-toy controls are limited by design – you’ll mostly control it through the app. The button is a single-button cycle for 7 vibration patterns, with only one vibration power level accessible on-toy. The rotating internal arm spins at one fixed speed regardless of which setting you select.

For the full 10 power settings and control over the arm’s speed, you have to use the app.

If you do have to use the on-toy button, the button placement is good. On most wearables, pressing the button often means pushing the toy uncomfortably against you or removing it completely first. But the Ida Wave’s button is on the side of the external arm.

Lovense Dolce On-Toy Controls Photo
Most toys’ buttons are on the top of the external arm, as shown here with the Lovense Dolce. Pressing the button(s) pushes the toy against your body, which can be annoying. I prefer the Ida Wave’s side-button placement.

It’s comfortable and easy to press, and doesn’t push the toy uncomfortably against your body, making it decent as a backup if you don’t feel like using the app.

Like most hands-free couples vibrators, the Sync 2’s on-toy controls are basic since many people will use the remote (or app if it worked well).

A single button cycles through 4 power levels and 6 vibration patterns on the same loop. To drop back to a lower power you have to click past the remaining patterns to get there. With 4 power levels covering the full range, the cycle is short enough for occasional use.

The button itself is easy to find and press: it’s visible, has a distinct feel, and sits on the external arm so you don’t have to remove the toy to adjust it. Pressing it pushes the toy more firmly against my body, but the wider button design keeps it comfortable enough.

We-Vibe Sync Old and New On Toy Buttons
The Sync 2 (left) has the updated button design, which I find a little easier to press than the old design, like that on the original Sync (right).

While the controls are limited, I actually like using the on-toy button during sex. It’s nice to just reach between my legs and click when I’m warmed up and ready for more intensity, rather than setting the remote down somewhere nearby and finding it again when I want to change settings.


Secure Fit & Adjustability


Secure Fit Rating 4.6 7.5
Adjustability Rating 5.9 7.5
Lelo Ida Wave Flexibility Demo Photo 1
We-Vibe Sync 2 Adjustability Demo Photo - Extreme Position 1
Lelo Ida Wave Flexibility Demo Photo 2
We-Vibe Sync 2 Adjustability Demo Photo - Extreme Position 2
Secure Fit (In Bed) 5.9 7.5
Secure Fit (Light Activity) 4.0 8.0
Secure Fit (Heavy Activity) 3.0 6.5
Adjustment Type Flexible Hinged (Single Hinge)
Shape Degrees of Freedom 0 1
Hinge 1 Location N/A Base of clit arm
Hinge 1 - Angular Range (Opening / Closing) N/A 110 °

The Ida Wave is the least secure-fitting dual-stim wearable I’ve tested. I still really enjoy this toy, but you can’t wear it around. And even in bed, I have to make occasional adjustments.

The rotating internal arm is small and flexible while the external arm is broad and heavy, so the toy’s own weight slowly works the internal arm out. It’s flexible, but not adjustable, so there are no hinges to actually re-shape the toy to make it more secure.

In bed, the Ida Wave stays workable but never feels fully reliably anchored. I can roll, shift positions, even kneel, but I find myself adjusting it or pushing the internal arm back in a few times per session. The clit vibrations are stimulating, but for the best experience, plan to use your hand every so often to re-position it. If you’ll find that annoying, dual-stimulation toys without motion like the Lovense Dolce are much more secure.

Lelo Ida Wave and Lovense Dolce Internal Arm Comparison
The Ida Wave’s (left) slim internal arm and heavy external arm makes it easy for the toy to slip out. Thicker internal arms, like the Dolce’s (right) take more effort to get in, but also take a firm tug to pull back out.

The Ida Wave is not designed to be worn around. When I walked around with it in, I had to keep pushing it back into position; only my underwear stopped it from falling all the way out. It also bumps against the inside of my legs, making walking awkward. With any sort of heavier activity like running or jumping the Ida Wave pulls most of the way out.

Lelo Ida Wave with Lovense Ferri and Lovense Lush 4
Panty vibrators and egg vibrators like the Lovense Ferri (left) and Lovense Lush 4 (right) are better designed to wear while walking around.

If walking around or moving with the toy in is part of what you want from a wearable, the Ida Wave isn’t built for it – and really none of my strong dual-stimulation wearables are easy to wear around. A panty vibrator like the Lovense Ferri or egg vibrator like the Lovense Lush 4 are much more secure. You can even wear both of these at the same time and control them through the Lovense app.

Here I cover the Sync 2’s fit for solo use in bed, walking around, and heavier movement – for fit during sex, see Hands-Free Use During Sex.

While you can wear the Sync 2 around, it’s best thought of as a bonus. It stays put in bed and through light movement, but it’s less secure than wearables designed specifically to wear around.

We-Vibe Sync 2 with Flexible Only Couples Vibrators
The Sync 2 (far left) has one adjustable hinge, which allows me to get a much better and more stimulating fit compared to the models to the right, which are only flexible.

The Sync 2 has one adjustable hinge near the base of the clitoral arm, letting you change the angle to better fit your body. For me, this makes a huge difference and is essential for a C-shaped couples vibrator to fit securely. Options without an adjustable hinge – like the Romp Join, We-Vibe Sync Lite, Sync Go, and Lelo’s Tiani line – shift off my clit easily or even fall out when I move.

In bed, the Sync 2 stays where I want it through normal shifting and rolling, though the C-shaped half-in, half-out design just feels more precarious than other wearables.

When walking around the movement isn’t too much and clothes help hold it in place. I am able to walk around, go up and down stairs and do light activity without it shifting around or feeling like it’s falling out and I don’t need to make adjustments.

But heavier movement can be too much for the shape. After jumping a bit, I had to push it back up into me as it had mostly wiggled out, only held from falling by my underwear and pants.

We-Vibe Sync 2 with More Secure Alternatives
The larger size of an egg vibrator keeps it more securely in place compared to the Sync 2’s slim internal arm. And panty vibrators with a magnet are also better secured in place.

If you mainly want something to wear around, I’d look at an egg vibrator or magnetic panty vibrator instead. Egg vibrators stay anchored more securely because their internal arms are larger and more bulbous. While magnetic panty vibrators like the Lovense Ferri keep the clit motor fixed to your underwear. The Sync 2 is the right pick to use during sex; those are better picks for wearing around.


Comfort


Comfort Rating 6.0 10.0
In Bed 7.4 10.0
Light Activity 4.5 10.0

The Ida Wave is much more comfortable in bed than it is for walking around. Lying down, the slim internal arm is pretty comfortable, and the broad external arm distributes pressure evenly. But once I’m standing or walking, the toy starts to pull out, which can make it pinch uncomfortably.

Lelo Ida Wave showing how broad the clit arm is

In bed, the internal arm is slim enough that it doesn’t limit my movement as much as more bulbous internal arms. The external arm is broad enough that I can’t fully close my legs around it, but my legs help to keep it in place. And this breadth helps spread the pressure out instead of pinching, like the narrower Lovense Flexer can.

The Ida Wave’s broad external arm anchors the toy against the internal arm’s rotation motion. This gentle rocking and broad pressure is very comfortable.
The Flexer’s slimmer external arm moves much more, which can be distracting or overstimulating to some.

Walking around is the weak point. As the internal arm slowly works its way out, it can press uncomfortably against my pubic bone. So if mobile comfort is your priority, try a panty vibrator like the Lovense Ferri or egg vibrator like the Lovense Lush Mini instead. Or try wearing them both at the same time for dual-stimulation that’s more comfy to wear around.

The Ida Wave is best treated as an in-bed wearable.

Here I cover the comfort during solo use in bed and wearing around – for comfort during sex, see Hands-Free Use During Sex.

The We-Vibe Sync 2 is an extremely comfortable C-shaped couples vibrator, whether in bed or while walking around.

We-Vibe Sync 2 Adjustablility
The Sync 2 has a wide range of adjustability.

Because of its adjustable hinge, it fits snugly enough to stay tight to my body, but it does not pinch, poke, or press so hard that I want to take it out. Since it fits snug in bed, it doesn’t tap my clit uncomfortably as I change positions. And the silicone material feels really comfortable too.

Internal Arm Size Comparison of We-Vibe Sync 2 with Lovense Lush 4 and Lovense Lush Mini
The size of internal arms can vary with wearables. I find the Sync 2’s (left) smaller internal arm more comfortable than egg vibrators (middle and right), but not as secure when walking.

It’s also comfortable when walking around since the internal arm is slimmer than large egg vibrators and the external arm contours my body and provides comfortable broad coverage. The tighter hinge angle I like in bed presses a little too firmly against my pubic bone once clothing adds extra pressure over the toy. But when I loosen the hinge a bit wider before walking, the Sync 2 becomes very comfortable for light activity – still close enough to keep clit contact, but not so tight that the pressure becomes distracting.


Noise


Noise Rating 8.5 9.3
Decibels on Low Power 45.1 dBA 35.0 dBA
Decibels on High Power 56.2 dBA 35.0 dBA
Audibility - Background Noise Masking 8.5 8.5
Quiet (56 dBA) - Low Power Inaudible Inaudible
Quiet (56 dBA) - Middle Power Inaudible Inaudible
Quiet (56 dBA) - High Power Inaudible Inaudible
Moderate (62 dBA) - Low Power Inaudible Inaudible
Moderate (62 dBA) - Middle Power Inaudible Inaudible
Moderate (62 dBA) - High Power Inaudible Inaudible
Loud (68 dBA) - Low Power Inaudible Inaudible
Loud (68 dBA) - Middle Power Inaudible Inaudible
Loud (68 dBA) - High Power Inaudible Inaudible
Audibility Behind Closed Door 10.0 10.0
Low Power Inaudible Inaudible
Middle Power Inaudible Inaudible
High Power Inaudible Inaudible
High Power with Box Fan Inaudible Inaudible
High Power with Music Inaudible Inaudible

The Lelo Ida Wave is very discreet – especially surprising since toys with motion are typically loud.

When held in the open air, the decibel readings are somewhat loud on paper – about 45 dBA on low and 56 dBA on high. But once you’re actually wearing the toy, the body dampens both the vibration and the motion noise substantially.

Motion-based wearables are typically louder – the Lovense Flexer here is a prime example.

The Ida Wave was fully masked at every power level in our Background Noise Masking subtest. In this part of the test, I wear the toy while my partner listens from three feet away and we play pink noise through a speaker at quiet, moderate, and loud volumes (56, 62, and 68 dBA). He couldn’t hear the Ida Wave at any strength under any of our three tested background volumes – and even when he stepped right next to me to check the sound, he could only pick up the vibrations, not the rotating motion at all.

Behind a closed bedroom door, the Ida Wave was also inaudible. For this part of the test, my partner listens directly outside our bedroom door while I use the toy in bed. I use it like a handheld toy since wearing dampens sound, and some people want the flexibility to safely re-position wearables or use some of them handheld. Holding the toy instead of wearing it gives us the most conservative results. He couldn’t hear the Ida Wave at any setting from behind the door.

The Ida Wave is the quietest of my strong dual-stimulation wearables.

The Sync 2 has excellent noise levels – in the most discreet tier of wearables I’ve tested.

Decibel readings on low and high power were too quiet for our Sound Level Meter to pick up on. The ambient room noise was 35 dBA, and the Sync 2 never measured higher than this. Its clit motor also has a deeper, rumbly sound that blends into the room more easily than sharper, buzzier vibrations.

It also performed extremely well in our Background Noise Masking test. In this test, I wear the toy while my partner listens from three feet away, with pink noise playing at quiet, moderate, and loud volumes (56, 62, and 68 dBA). He couldn’t hear the Sync 2 at any vibration strength with any of the background noise levels playing. Without background audio, it is audible in the same room – but every wearable vibrator we’ve tested is, even the quietest ones.

Behind a closed bedroom door, the Sync 2 was also inaudible. For this part of the test, I use the toy in bed while my partner listens from outside the door. I hold it like a handheld vibrator instead of wearing it, since wearing a toy dampens sound and holding it gives us more conservative results. He couldn’t hear the Sync 2 at any strength – no fan, music, or other masking noise needed.

Most hands-free couples vibrators we’ve tested fall into this same especially-discreet group, including the We-Vibe Chorus. So if you’re choosing between couples vibes, the stimulation, comfort, and fit during sex matter more than small noise differences.


Battery Life


Battery Life Rating 9.3 6.2
Lelo Ida Wave Charging Cable Photo
We-Vibe Sync 2 Charging Cable Photo
Power Source Rechargeable Rechargeable
Battery Life on High Power 135 minutes 63 minutes
Charging Cable Round Plug Magnetic

The Lelo Ida Wave lasted 135 minutes at top power in our testing – the longest battery life of any dual-stimulation wearable I’ve tested. And since you’ll spend plenty of time on lower and middle settings too, real-world runtime is typically longer. That’s plenty of time, even if you sometimes forget to charge between uses.

The Sync 2 lasted 63 minutes continuously running both motors at full power in our test. That’s enough for most bedroom use, but it’s short if you want to wear the toy around for extended foreplay or all-evening teasing.

It’s also the shortest battery life in We-Vibe’s hinged couples-vibrator lineup, though only barely behind the Chorus at 65 minutes. The Chorus Pro lasts 75 minutes, the original Sync lasts 85 minutes, and the Sync O lasts 93 minutes. If you want a longer-lasting hinged couples vibrator, the Sync O is the better We-Vibe pick. If long battery life matters more than the during-sex use, the Lovense Ferri lasts 168 minutes.


Cleaning


Cleaning Rating 10.0 10.0
Lelo Ida Wave Waterproof Rating Demonstration
We-Vibe Sync 2 Waterproof Rating Demonstration
Waterproof Rating IPX7 IPX7

The Lelo Ida Wave is very easy to clean. It’s IPX7 waterproof, so you can rinse it under a running faucet or fully submerge it in soapy water without worrying about water damage.

The We-Vibe Sync 2 is easy to clean. It’s fully waterproof – rated IPX7, so you can rinse it under a running faucet or fully submerge it in soapy water without worry.

However, the IPX4 remote can only resist light water splashes. You should not take the remote into the shower or clean it under a running faucet. Clean the remote with a damp towel.


Build Quality


Build Quality Rating 9.0 9.0
Lelo Ida Wave Build Quality
We-Vibe Sync 2 Build Quality

The Ida Wave’s build quality is excellent. I’ve owned my Ida Wave since 2022, and it’s continued to operate as expected. The silicone is smooth, the shiny plastic top has stayed scratch-free with normal use, and the seams between materials are tight. The flex point between the internal and external arms feels solidly built, with no loosening or signs of strain.

The We-Vibe Sync 2 has excellent build quality. It’s coated entirely in smooth, plush silicone, and the external arm’s adjustable hinge feels sturdy when I apply pressure to it. The connection between the internal and external arms also feels solid, so I’m not worried about it snapping during normal use. We-Vibe’s newer circular on-toy button is easier to press than the slim buttons on older models, and the remote’s buttons have a clear click feel. I’ve owned the Sync 2 since May 2023, and it has continued to work as expected.


General Design and Specs


Internal Arm Dimensions and Design:
Lelo Ida Wave Dimensions Photo - Product Set On Graph Paper With Carpenter Square to See Size
We-Vibe Sync 2 Dimensions Photo - Product Set On Graph Paper With Carpenter Square to See Size
Insertable Length 3.1 inches 2.6 inches
Lelo Ida Wave Internal Arm Max Width Measurement Photo
We-Vibe Sync 2 Internal Arm Max Width Measurement Photo
Max Width 1.1 inches 1.2 inches
Lelo Ida Wave Internal Arm Max Thickness Measurement Photo
We-Vibe Sync 2 Internal Arm Max Thickness Measurement Photo
Max Thickness 1.0 inches 0.6 inches
Lelo Ida Wave Internal Arm Cross-Section View Photo
We-Vibe Sync 2 Internal Arm Cross-Section View Photo
Cross-Section Profile Unique Slim with G-Spot Contour
Lelo Ida Wave Internal Arm Longitudinal Shape View Photo
We-Vibe Sync 2 Internal Arm Longitudinal Shape View Photo
Longitudinal Shape Slim Elongated Arm with Bulbous Section Slim Bulbous G-Spot Section

The Sync 2’s internal arm is slimmer than a dedicated egg vibrator but more bulbous than the Sync O’s loop. That shape is important: it gives the toy enough front-wall pressure to make sex more stimulating without taking up as much space as a large insertable toy.

External Arm Dimensions and Design:
Lelo Ida Wave Dimensions Photo - Product Set On Graph Paper With Carpenter Square to See Size
We-Vibe Sync 2 Dimensions Photo - Product Set On Graph Paper With Carpenter Square to See Size
Length 1.9 inches 2.8 inches
Lelo Ida Wave External Arm Max Width Measurement Photo
We-Vibe Sync 2 External Arm Max Width Measurement Photo
Max Width at Clit Region 2.0 inches 1.2 inches
Lelo Ida Wave External Arm Max Thickness Measurement Photo
We-Vibe Sync 2 External Arm Max Thickness Measurement Photo
Max Thickness 1.3 inches 0.9 inches
Lelo Ida Wave External Arm Contact Surface Precision Photo
We-Vibe Sync 2 External Arm Contact Surface Precision Photo
Contact Surface Precision Broad Medium
Lelo Ida Wave External Arm Lengthwise Curvature Photo
We-Vibe Sync 2 External Arm Lengthwise Curvature Photo
Lengthwise Curvature Straight Body-Contoured / Concave Curved
Overall Specs:
Lelo Ida Wave Weight Measurement Photo
We-Vibe Sync 2 Weight Measurement Photo
Weight 3.6 ounces 2.3 ounces
Material Silicone Silicone

Check Prices

Help Improve Our Review

Would you recommend this article to someone considering these products?
Not at all Likely Extremely Likely
If you provide your email, we may contact you to learn more about why you did or did not find our review helpful. Providing your email is purely optional.